Overview
From a portfolio lens, 1INCH ($114.54M) and CHEEMS ($101.20M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | 1INCH | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.081500 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $114.54M | $101.20M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $319,738.27 | $288,119.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 234.00 | 254.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | 1INCH | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.99% | +5.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | 1INCH | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, 1INCH shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while CHEEMS sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | 1INCH | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
1INCH
CHEEMS
Pros and cons
Pros of 1INCH
- Market-cap scale on 1INCH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- 1INCH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for 1INCH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- 1INCH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of 1INCH
- Indicator stacks on 1INCH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, 1INCH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around 1INCH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of CHEEMS
- If technical momentum aligns, CHEEMS may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on CHEEMS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for CHEEMS still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of CHEEMS
- Higher volatility on CHEEMS cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for CHEEMS.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to 1INCH, while short-term performance leans toward CHEEMS. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing 1INCH and CHEEMS begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.081500 versus $1,882.43. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate CHEEMS-vs-1INCH pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, 1INCH or CHEEMS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. 1INCH leads on market cap today, while CHEEMS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, 1INCH or CHEEMS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both 1INCH and CHEEMS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is CHEEMS, but longer windows can disagree.