Overview
Investors searching BNB vs 1INCH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. BNB prints $586.63 (+1.69%) while 1INCH is at $0.081000 (+0.12%), with volume edge currently on BNB.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BNB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $586.63 | $0.081000 |
| Market Cap | $76.02B | $113.92M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $53.45M | $326,915.55 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 4.00 | 239.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +2.42% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BNB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.69% | +0.12% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BNB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 50.36 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 13.94 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.41 | 21.33 |
| Support | 575.45 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 589.75 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (45.00 vs 57.90) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BNB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 4,252.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BNB
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of BNB
- Composite PEPS readings for BNB can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for BNB can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BNB typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of BNB
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BNB harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on BNB may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus BNB with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of 1INCH
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, BNB looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, BNB is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BNB holds market-cap $76.02B and rank #4; 1INCH shows $113.92M and #239. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch BNB. Where durability matters, watch BNB. AI composite scores (45.00/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BNB or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BNB leads on market cap today, while BNB leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BNB or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BNB and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BNB currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BNB, but longer windows can disagree.