Overview
1INCH vs ZK is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | 1INCH | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.081000 | $0.007770 |
| Market Cap | $113.92M | $78.37M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $326,915.55 | $857,979.79 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 239.00 | 295.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | 1INCH | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.12% | -2.88% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | 1INCH | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across 1INCH and ZK, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | 1INCH | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
1INCH
ZK
Pros and cons
Pros of 1INCH
- 1INCH has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for 1INCH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on 1INCH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of 1INCH
- When dominance narratives fade, 1INCH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit 1INCH harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of ZK
- Active volume bursts on ZK sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus 1INCH with ZK can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for ZK still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around ZK can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of ZK
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ZK more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus 1INCH can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ZK.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. 1INCH and ZK can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: 1INCH (1INCH) trades near $0.081000 with a +0.12% day move, while ZK (ZK) is around $0.007770 (-2.88%). Volume leadership currently sits with ZK, and market-cap leadership with 1INCH. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, 1INCH or ZK?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. 1INCH leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, 1INCH or ZK?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both 1INCH and ZK.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ZK currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.