Overview
Investors searching 1INCH vs GENIUS usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. 1INCH prints $0.081400 (+0.87%) while GENIUS is at $0.325500 (+0.46%), with volume edge currently on 1INCH.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.081400 | $0.325500 |
| Market Cap | $114.51M | $109.85M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $360,111.27 | $159,828.42 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 234.00 | 243.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.87% | +0.46% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on 1INCH and bearish on GENIUS. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | 1INCH | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
1INCH
GENIUS
Pros and cons
Pros of 1INCH
- Composite PEPS readings for 1INCH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- 1INCH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for 1INCH can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of 1INCH
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit 1INCH harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, 1INCH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of GENIUS
- Narrative optionality around GENIUS can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on GENIUS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for GENIUS still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus 1INCH with GENIUS can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of GENIUS
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GENIUS more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on GENIUS often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put 1INCH at $0.081400 and GENIUS at $0.325500. Relative performance over 24h (1INCH) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, 1INCH or GENIUS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. 1INCH leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, 1INCH or GENIUS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both 1INCH and GENIUS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.