Overview
Whether you arrived from a “BUIDL vs SUN” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | SUN |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,866.49 | $0.018060 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $345.68M |
| FDV | $2.70B | $358.27M |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $265,167.84 |
| Circulating Supply | 2,703,988,728 | 19,222,181,989 |
| Total Supply | 2,703,988,728 | 19,900,730,000 |
| Max Supply | — | 19,900,730,000 |
| Rank | 35 | 117 |
| Dominance | 0.12% | 0.02% |
| Liquidity | 69.7/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Volatility | 3.54% | 3.54% |
| ATH | $1.00 | $66.45 |
| ATL | $1.00 | $0.004623 |
| ROI | +0.00% | -99.97% |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | SUN |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | +0.00% | +0.00% |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.39% |
| 7D | +0.00% | +1.40% |
| 30D | +0.00% | +4.60% |
| 90D | +0.00% | -10.20% |
| 1Y | +0.00% | -15.60% |
| YTD | — | -4.20% |
| ALL | +0.00% | -99.97% |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | SUN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.92 | 49.92 |
| MACD histogram | — | 0.00 |
| EMA20 | 1,850.51 | 0.02 |
| EMA50 | 2,161.23 | 0.02 |
| EMA100 | — | 0.02 |
| EMA200 | — | 0.02 |
| SMA50 | — | 0.02 |
| SMA200 | — | 0.02 |
| ATR | 65.80 | 65.80 |
| ADX | 19.30 | 19.30 |
| Support | 1,826.38 | 1,826.38 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | SHORT | SHORT |
| Momentum | 62.00 | 62.00 |
| Signal | BUY | BUY |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for BUIDL/SUN currently lean on separate regimes: SHORT versus SHORT. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | SUN |
|---|---|---|
| Whale activity | $0.000000 | $0.000000 |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
SUN
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of BUIDL
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BUIDL harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around BUIDL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of SUN
- Active volume bursts on SUN sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around SUN can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for SUN still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of SUN
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SUN.
- Trend failures on SUN often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for BUIDL on size and SUN on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BUIDL holds market-cap $2.70B and rank #35; SUN shows $345.68M and #117. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch SUN. Where durability matters, watch BUIDL. AI composite scores (57.40/57.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or SUN?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while SUN leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or SUN?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and SUN.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SUN currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is SUN, but longer windows can disagree.