Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Worldcoin and Bonk are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | BONK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.315801 | $0.000003 |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $254.32M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $113.78M | $25.65M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 61.00 | 135.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | BONK |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.30% | +3.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | BONK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for WLD/BONK currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | BONK |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Worldcoin
Bonk
Pros and cons
Pros of Worldcoin
- Market-cap scale on Worldcoin may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Worldcoin can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Worldcoin
- Crowded positioning around WLD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Worldcoin harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Bonk
- If technical momentum aligns, Bonk may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Bonk can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Worldcoin with Bonk can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Bonk
- Relative underperformance versus Worldcoin can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on BONK cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Bonk.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Worldcoin on size and Worldcoin on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Worldcoin at $0.315801 and Bonk at $0.000003. Relative performance over 24h (Worldcoin) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Worldcoin or Bonk?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Worldcoin leads on market cap today, while Worldcoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or BONK?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Worldcoin and Bonk.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Worldcoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Worldcoin, but longer windows can disagree.