Overview
BNB and WLD rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($586.65/$0.315325) and 24h leaders (Worldcoin) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BNB | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $586.65 | $0.315325 |
| Market Cap | $76.02B | $1.13B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $45.19M | $115.00M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 4.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +2.40% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BNB | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.78% | +4.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BNB | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 57.52 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 14.15 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.62 | 20.44 |
| Support | 575.45 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 601.40 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BNB shows RSI 57.52 with trend bias bearish, while Worldcoin sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BNB | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 4,252.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BNB
Worldcoin
Pros and cons
Pros of BNB
- BNB typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- BNB has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- BNB often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of BNB
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, BNB can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on BNB may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Worldcoin
- Worldcoin can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for Worldcoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Worldcoin can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, Worldcoin may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Worldcoin
- Higher volatility on WLD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus BNB can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Worldcoin often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BNB, while short-term performance leans toward Worldcoin. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BNB holds market-cap $76.02B and rank #4; Worldcoin shows $1.13B and #61. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Worldcoin. Where durability matters, watch BNB. AI composite scores (43.90/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BNB or Worldcoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BNB leads on market cap today, while Worldcoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BNB or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BNB and Worldcoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Worldcoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Worldcoin, but longer windows can disagree.