Overview
Investors searching WLD vs SAND usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. WLD prints $0.314700 (+4.38%) while SAND is at $0.043210 (+5.29%), with volume edge currently on WLD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.314700 | $0.043210 |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $129.63M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.01M | $466,421.61 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 61.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.38% | +5.29% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on WLD and bearish on SAND. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
WLD
SAND
Pros and cons
Pros of WLD
- Market-cap scale on WLD may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- WLD often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- WLD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of WLD
- Indicator stacks on WLD may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit WLD harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around WLD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of SAND
- SAND can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for SAND still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus WLD with SAND can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, SAND may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of SAND
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SAND.
- Relative underperformance versus WLD can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. WLD holds market-cap $1.13B and rank #61; SAND shows $129.63M and #232. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch WLD. Where durability matters, watch WLD. AI composite scores (58.40/58.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, WLD or SAND?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. WLD leads on market cap today, while SAND leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or SAND?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both WLD and SAND.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is SAND, but longer windows can disagree.