Overview
Investors searching UB vs 1INCH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. UB prints $1,861.70 (+3.00%) while 1INCH is at $0.081400 (+0.87%), with volume edge currently on UB.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | UB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $0.081400 |
| Market Cap | $415.61M | $114.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $26.20M | $323,022.75 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 106.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | UB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.00% | +0.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | UB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on UB and bearish on 1INCH. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | UB | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
UB
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of UB
- Market-cap scale on UB may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- UB typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for UB can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of UB
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around UB sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for UB can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of 1INCH
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of 1INCH
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus UB can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. UB holds market-cap $415.61M and rank #106; 1INCH shows $114.26M and #236. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch UB. Where durability matters, watch UB. AI composite scores (57.80/57.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, UB or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. UB leads on market cap today, while UB leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, UB or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both UB and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. UB currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is UB, but longer windows can disagree.