Overview
Whether you arrived from a “JST vs ULTIMA” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.106460 | $1,874.22 |
| Market Cap | $871.00M | $209.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.54M | $2.55M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 74.00 | 156.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.15% | +2.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across JST and ULTIMA, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- JST typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for JST can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on JST may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of JST
- Indicator stacks on JST may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for JST can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around JST sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of ULTIMA
- ULTIMA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around ULTIMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on ULTIMA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ULTIMA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. JST and ULTIMA can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put JST at $0.106460 and ULTIMA at $1,874.22. Relative performance over 24h (ULTIMA) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.