Overview
FDUSD (FDUSD) and ULTIMA (ULTIMA) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($0.997900 vs $1,880.40), market leadership still favors FDUSD on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by ULTIMA.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FDUSD | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.997900 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $349.13M | $208.38M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $15.83M | $3.02M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 116.00 | 156.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FDUSD | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +3.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FDUSD | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, FDUSD shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while ULTIMA sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FDUSD | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FDUSD
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of FDUSD
- FDUSD often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- FDUSD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for FDUSD can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of FDUSD
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around FDUSD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit FDUSD harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of ULTIMA
- PEPS tracking for ULTIMA still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, ULTIMA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around ULTIMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on ULTIMA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ULTIMA.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to FDUSD, while short-term performance leans toward ULTIMA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. FDUSD holds market-cap $349.13M and rank #116; ULTIMA shows $208.38M and #156. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch FDUSD. Where durability matters, watch FDUSD. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, FDUSD or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FDUSD leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FDUSD or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FDUSD and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FDUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.