Overview
JUP vs PC0000031 is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | PC0000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.192700 | $1,855.02 |
| Market Cap | $638.77M | $202.50M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.35M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 88.00 | 159.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | PC0000031 |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -2.87% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | PC0000031 |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across JUP and PC0000031, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | PC0000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
PC0000031
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- JUP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on JUP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for JUP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of JUP
- Indicator stacks on JUP may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of PC0000031
- PC0000031 can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus JUP with PC0000031 can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of PC0000031
- Relative underperformance versus JUP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on PC0000031 cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave PC0000031 more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. JUP and PC0000031 can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JUP holds market-cap $638.77M and rank #88; PC0000031 shows $202.50M and #159. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch JUP. Where durability matters, watch JUP. AI composite scores (57.00/57.00) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or PC0000031?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while PC0000031 leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or PC0000031?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and PC0000031.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is PC0000031, but longer windows can disagree.