Overview
From a portfolio lens, The Graph ($155.33M) and OriginTrail ($122.96M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GRT | TRAC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.014382 | $0.274908 |
| Market Cap | $155.33M | $122.96M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.87M | $3.35M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 189.00 | 220.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GRT | TRAC |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.70% | +2.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GRT | TRAC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, The Graph shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while OriginTrail sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GRT | TRAC |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
The Graph
OriginTrail
Pros and cons
Pros of The Graph
- Market-cap scale on The Graph may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for The Graph can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- GRT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of The Graph
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, The Graph can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of OriginTrail
- If technical momentum aligns, OriginTrail may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus The Graph with OriginTrail can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of OriginTrail
- Relative underperformance versus The Graph can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on TRAC cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave OriginTrail more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to The Graph, while short-term performance leans toward OriginTrail. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: The Graph (GRT) trades near $0.014382 with a +0.70% day move, while OriginTrail (TRAC) is around $0.274908 (+2.70%). Volume leadership currently sits with The Graph, and market-cap leadership with The Graph. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, The Graph or OriginTrail?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. The Graph leads on market cap today, while OriginTrail leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GRT or TRAC?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both The Graph and OriginTrail.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. The Graph currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is OriginTrail, but longer windows can disagree.