Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Sui and ACRED are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.687400 | $1,856.18 |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $115.01M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $8.04M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 32.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.39% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 43.42 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.03 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 19.19 | 20.44 |
| Support | 0.66 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.78 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Sui and ACRED, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 219.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,403.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sui
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of Sui
- Sui has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Sui typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Sui
- Large-cap status for Sui can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around SUI sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, Sui can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ACRED
- Active volume bursts on ACRED sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus Sui with ACRED can change portfolio factor exposure.
- ACRED can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of ACRED
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ACRED.
- Higher volatility on ACRED cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Sui and ACRED can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Sui at $0.687400 and ACRED at $1,856.18. Relative performance over 24h (ACRED) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Sui or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sui leads on market cap today, while ACRED leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SUI or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sui and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sui currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ACRED, but longer windows can disagree.