Overview
USAT vs SHFL is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USAT | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $185.25M | $116.89M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.67M | $1.13M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 168.00 | 230.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USAT | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | -8.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USAT | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USAT | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USAT
SHFL
Pros and cons
Pros of USAT
- Higher ranking for USAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- USAT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- USAT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of USAT
- Large-cap status for USAT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on USAT may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, USAT can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of SHFL
- Active volume bursts on SHFL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus USAT with SHFL can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for SHFL still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of SHFL
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SHFL.
- Trend failures on SHFL often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on SHFL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (USAT) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (USAT) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: USAT (USAT) trades near $1,880.40 with a +0.00% day move, while SHFL (SHFL) is around $1,880.40 (-8.80%). Volume leadership currently sits with USAT, and market-cap leadership with USAT. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, USAT or SHFL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USAT leads on market cap today, while USAT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USAT or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USAT and SHFL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is USAT, but longer windows can disagree.