Overview
From a portfolio lens, Shuffle ($115.99M) and Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL ($114.50M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | PC0000023 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.272718 | $1.00 |
| Market Cap | $115.99M | $114.50M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.55M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 230.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | PC0000023 |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.70% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | PC0000023 |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Shuffle shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | PC0000023 |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Market-cap scale on Shuffle may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Shuffle can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Shuffle typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Shuffle
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around SHFL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL
- PEPS tracking for Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on PC0000023 sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus Shuffle can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Shuffle, while short-term performance leans toward Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Shuffle at $0.272718 and Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL at $1.00. Relative performance over 24h (Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or PC0000023?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Shuffle currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Tradable Singapore Fintech SSL, but longer windows can disagree.