Overview
From a portfolio lens, Axie Infinity ($144.69M) and Shuffle ($127.00M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | AXS | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.830612 | $0.298731 |
| Market Cap | $144.69M | $127.00M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $8.25M | $509,158.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 201.00 | 216.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | AXS | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | -0.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | AXS | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.80 vs 57.80) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | AXS | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Axie Infinity
Shuffle
Pros and cons
Pros of Axie Infinity
- Higher ranking for Axie Infinity can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Axie Infinity has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Axie Infinity typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Axie Infinity
- When dominance narratives fade, Axie Infinity can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Axie Infinity harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on Axie Infinity may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Shuffle
- Diversifying versus Axie Infinity with Shuffle can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for Shuffle still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Shuffle
- Trend failures on Shuffle often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Shuffle more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus Axie Infinity can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Shuffle.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Axie Infinity looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Axie Infinity / Shuffle is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Axie Infinity (AXS) trades near $0.830612 with a -0.50% day move, while Shuffle (SHFL) is around $0.298731 (-0.50%). Volume leadership currently sits with Axie Infinity, and market-cap leadership with Axie Infinity. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Axie Infinity or Shuffle?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Axie Infinity leads on market cap today, while Axie Infinity / Shuffle leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, AXS or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Axie Infinity and Shuffle.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Axie Infinity currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Axie Infinity / Shuffle, but longer windows can disagree.