Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Sei vs yearn.finance” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SEI | YFI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.041110 | $2,110.61 |
| Market Cap | $276.81M | $76.07M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $14.32M | $5.11M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 128.00 | 300.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SEI | YFI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.40% | -1.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SEI | YFI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for SEI/YFI currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SEI | YFI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sei
yearn.finance
Pros and cons
Pros of Sei
- Composite PEPS readings for Sei can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Sei has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on Sei may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Sei can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Sei
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sei harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on Sei may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of yearn.finance
- Narrative optionality around yearn.finance can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Sei with yearn.finance can change portfolio factor exposure.
- yearn.finance can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of yearn.finance
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave yearn.finance more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for yearn.finance.
- Relative underperformance versus Sei can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on yearn.finance often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Sei on size and Sei on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Sei at $0.041110 and yearn.finance at $2,110.61. Relative performance over 24h (Sei) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Sei or yearn.finance?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sei leads on market cap today, while Sei leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SEI or YFI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sei and yearn.finance.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sei, but longer windows can disagree.