Overview
Whether you arrived from a “WLD vs Sei” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.315700 | $0.041270 |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $301.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.97M | $809,257.92 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 61.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.85% | +0.63% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for WLD/SEI currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
WLD
Sei
Pros and cons
Pros of WLD
- Market-cap scale on WLD may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for WLD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of WLD
- Indicator stacks on WLD may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around WLD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for WLD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Sei
- If technical momentum aligns, Sei may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Sei still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Sei can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Sei
- Relative underperformance versus WLD can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on SEI cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Sei often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for WLD on size and WLD on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. WLD and Sei solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, WLD or Sei?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. WLD leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or SEI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both WLD and Sei.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.