Overview
HASH (HASH) and Sei (SEI) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($1,887.28 vs $0.041570), market leadership still favors HASH on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Sei.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.041570 |
| Market Cap | $440.26M | $301.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1,642.60 | $819,276.78 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.50% | +1.29% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, HASH shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Sei sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
Sei
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- Composite PEPS readings for HASH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on HASH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- HASH has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of HASH
- When dominance narratives fade, HASH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit HASH harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Sei
- Diversifying versus HASH with Sei can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around Sei can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Sei can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on SEI sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Sei
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Sei more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on Sei often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to HASH, while short-term performance leans toward Sei. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put HASH at $1,887.28 and Sei at $0.041570. Relative performance over 24h (Sei) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or Sei?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while Sei leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or SEI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and Sei.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sei, but longer windows can disagree.