Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Sei and 1INCH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SEI | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.041390 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $301.91M | $114.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.30M | $334,795.44 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 127.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SEI | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.17% | +0.37% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SEI | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Sei and 1INCH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SEI | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sei
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of Sei
- Composite PEPS readings for Sei can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Sei can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Sei typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Sei
- Large-cap status for Sei can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sei harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around SEI sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus Sei with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of 1INCH
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Sei can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Sei and 1INCH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Sei at $0.041390 and 1INCH at $0.081500. Relative performance over 24h (1INCH) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Sei or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sei leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SEI or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sei and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.