Overview
This page compares RAY and SHFL with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#179 vs #218) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.608000 | $1,853.59 |
| Market Cap | $163.53M | $126.92M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $229,249.27 | $529,328.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 218.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.08% | -1.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for RAY/SHFL currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
SHFL
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- RAY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- RAY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of RAY
- Indicator stacks on RAY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit RAY harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of SHFL
- PEPS tracking for SHFL still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- SHFL can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around SHFL can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of SHFL
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on SHFL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SHFL.
- Relative underperformance versus RAY can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for RAY on size and SHFL on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing RAY and SHFL begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.608000 versus $1,853.59. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate SHFL-vs-RAY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or SHFL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and SHFL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SHFL currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.