Overview
From a portfolio lens, Sei ($301.91M) and RAY ($164.40M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SEI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.041350 | $0.610700 |
| Market Cap | $301.91M | $164.40M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $798,340.37 | $188,674.63 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SEI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.17% | +1.99% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SEI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on SEI and bearish on RAY. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SEI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sei
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of Sei
- Sei typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- SEI often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for Sei can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on Sei may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Sei
- Crowded positioning around SEI sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Sei can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on Sei may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of RAY
- PEPS tracking for RAY still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, RAY may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of RAY
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Relative underperformance versus Sei can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
Comparing SEI and RAY begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.041350 versus $0.610700. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RAY-vs-SEI pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Sei or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sei leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SEI or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sei and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.