Overview
This page compares OHM and RAY with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#128 vs #179) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | OHM | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.52 | $0.610200 |
| Market Cap | $279.29M | $164.21M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $83,947.00 | $196,942.55 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 128.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | OHM | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.10% | +1.84% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | OHM | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across OHM and RAY, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | OHM | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
OHM
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of OHM
- Composite PEPS readings for OHM can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on OHM may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- OHM has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of OHM
- Large-cap status for OHM can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on OHM may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, OHM can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of RAY
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, RAY may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of RAY
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Trend failures on RAY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus OHM can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. OHM and RAY can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: OHM (OHM) trades near $1,880.52 with a +1.10% day move, while RAY (RAY) is around $0.610200 (+1.84%). Volume leadership currently sits with RAY, and market-cap leadership with OHM. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, OHM or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. OHM leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, OHM or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both OHM and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. RAY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.