Overview
RAY and GUSD rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.608000/$1,853.59) and 24h leaders (GUSD) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.608000 | $1,853.59 |
| Market Cap | $163.53M | $149.61M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $229,249.27 | $794,905.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 198.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.08% | +0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, RAY shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while GUSD sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | GUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
GUSD
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- RAY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for RAY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- RAY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of RAY
- Large-cap status for RAY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around RAY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, RAY can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of GUSD
- Diversifying versus RAY with GUSD can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around GUSD can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for GUSD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on GUSD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of GUSD
- Trend failures on GUSD often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GUSD.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to RAY, while short-term performance leans toward GUSD. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. RAY and GUSD solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or GUSD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while GUSD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or GUSD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and GUSD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GUSD, but longer windows can disagree.