Overview
Whether you arrived from a “FLOKI vs RAY” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FLOKI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000021 | $0.610700 |
| Market Cap | $197.86M | $164.40M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $632,128.78 | $188,674.63 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 162.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FLOKI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.33% | +1.99% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FLOKI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across FLOKI and RAY, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FLOKI | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FLOKI
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of FLOKI
- FLOKI has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for FLOKI can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- FLOKI often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of FLOKI
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit FLOKI harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on FLOKI may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of RAY
- Diversifying versus FLOKI with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- RAY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of RAY
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave RAY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. FLOKI and RAY can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put FLOKI at $0.000021 and RAY at $0.610700. Relative performance over 24h (RAY) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, FLOKI or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FLOKI leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FLOKI or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FLOKI and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FLOKI currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.