Overview
Whether you arrived from a “RAY vs MANA” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.609600 | $0.066700 |
| Market Cap | $164.07M | $130.64M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $206,799.09 | $244,652.86 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 213.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.15% | +0.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for RAY/MANA currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
MANA
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Higher ranking for RAY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- RAY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of RAY
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit RAY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for RAY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of MANA
- Diversifying versus RAY with MANA can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around MANA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- MANA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of MANA
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for MANA.
- Trend failures on MANA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus RAY can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for RAY on size and MANA on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. RAY holds market-cap $164.07M and rank #179; MANA shows $130.64M and #213. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch MANA. Where durability matters, watch RAY. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or MANA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or MANA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and MANA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. MANA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.