Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means ANTFUN and Raydium are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ANTFUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,882.43 | $0.612436 |
| Market Cap | $330.37M | $164.93M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $17.91M | $7.17M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 127.00 | 180.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ANTFUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | +2.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ANTFUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across ANTFUN and Raydium, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ANTFUN | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ANTFUN
Raydium
Pros and cons
Pros of ANTFUN
- Higher ranking for ANTFUN can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- ANTFUN has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- ANTFUN often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of ANTFUN
- When dominance narratives fade, ANTFUN can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on ANTFUN may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for ANTFUN can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Raydium
- Diversifying versus ANTFUN with Raydium can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around Raydium can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Raydium can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Raydium
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Raydium.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Raydium more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus ANTFUN can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. ANTFUN and Raydium can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing ANTFUN and RAY begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,882.43 versus $0.612436. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RAY-vs-ANTFUN pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, ANTFUN or Raydium?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ANTFUN leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ANTFUN or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ANTFUN and Raydium.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ANTFUN currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.