Overview
From a portfolio lens, QNT ($880.00M) and IOTA ($153.01M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.59 | $0.033500 |
| Market Cap | $880.00M | $153.01M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $755,234.52 | $172,817.86 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 193.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.11% | +4.04% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, QNT shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while IOTA sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
IOTA
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- Composite PEPS readings for QNT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- QNT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on QNT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for QNT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of QNT
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit QNT harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for QNT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on QNT may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, QNT can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of IOTA
- Active volume bursts on IOTA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus QNT with IOTA can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, IOTA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around IOTA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of IOTA
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for IOTA.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave IOTA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to QNT, while short-term performance leans toward IOTA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. QNT holds market-cap $880.00M and rank #72; IOTA shows $153.01M and #193. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch QNT. Where durability matters, watch QNT. AI composite scores (58.40/58.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or IOTA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while IOTA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or IOTA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and IOTA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. QNT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is IOTA, but longer windows can disagree.