Overview
Investors searching PUMP vs JUP usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. PUMP prints $0.002150 (+3.17%) while JUP is at $0.196100 (+3.48%), with volume edge currently on PUMP.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002150 | $0.196100 |
| Market Cap | $845.20M | $650.77M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.86M | $1.46M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 76.00 | 86.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.17% | +3.48% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.40 vs 58.40) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
PUMP
JUP
Pros and cons
Pros of PUMP
- Composite PEPS readings for PUMP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- PUMP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- PUMP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for PUMP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of PUMP
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit PUMP harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, PUMP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of JUP
- Narrative optionality around JUP can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on JUP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for JUP still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of JUP
- Trend failures on JUP often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for JUP.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, PUMP looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, JUP is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. PUMP holds market-cap $845.20M and rank #76; JUP shows $650.77M and #86. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch PUMP. Where durability matters, watch PUMP. AI composite scores (58.40/58.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, PUMP or JUP?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. PUMP leads on market cap today, while JUP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PUMP or JUP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both PUMP and JUP.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PUMP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JUP, but longer windows can disagree.