Overview
JUP and PENGU rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.194700/$0.006157) and 24h leaders (PENGU) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | PENGU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.194700 | $0.006157 |
| Market Cap | $647.36M | $388.07M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.62M | $5.34M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 87.00 | 111.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | PENGU |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.83% | +3.81% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | PENGU |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JUP shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while PENGU sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | PENGU |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
PENGU
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- Composite PEPS readings for JUP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- JUP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of JUP
- Large-cap status for JUP can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on JUP may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of PENGU
- Narrative optionality around PENGU can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, PENGU may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of PENGU
- Trend failures on PENGU often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for PENGU.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JUP, while short-term performance leans toward PENGU. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JUP holds market-cap $647.36M and rank #87; PENGU shows $388.07M and #111. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch PENGU. Where durability matters, watch JUP. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or PENGU?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while PENGU leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or PENGU?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and PENGU.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PENGU currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is PENGU, but longer windows can disagree.