Overview
From a portfolio lens, POL (ex-MATIC) ($826.65M) and 1INCH ($114.45M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | POL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.073110 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $826.65M | $114.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.24M | $334,795.44 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 77.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.66% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | POL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.21% | +0.37% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | POL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 35.61 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.00 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 24.06 | 21.33 |
| Support | 0.07 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.08 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, POL (ex-MATIC) shows RSI 35.61 with trend bias bearish, while 1INCH sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | POL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
POL (ex-MATIC)
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of POL (ex-MATIC)
- POL (ex-MATIC) has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- POL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for POL (ex-MATIC) can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of POL (ex-MATIC)
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit POL (ex-MATIC) harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on POL (ex-MATIC) may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for POL (ex-MATIC) can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of 1INCH
- Diversifying versus POL (ex-MATIC) with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on 1INCH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of 1INCH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus POL (ex-MATIC) can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to POL (ex-MATIC), while short-term performance leans toward 1INCH. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: POL (ex-MATIC) (POL) trades near $0.073110 with a +0.21% day move, while 1INCH (1INCH) is around $0.081500 (+0.37%). Volume leadership currently sits with POL (ex-MATIC), and market-cap leadership with POL (ex-MATIC). Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 35.61/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, POL (ex-MATIC) or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. POL (ex-MATIC) leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, POL or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both POL (ex-MATIC) and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. POL (ex-MATIC) currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.