Overview
From a portfolio lens, Shuffle ($127.00M) and Ozone Chain ($125.30M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | OZO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.298731 | $0.130492 |
| Market Cap | $127.00M | $125.30M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $509,158.00 | $85,256.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 216.00 | 220.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | OZO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | +0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | OZO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Shuffle shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Ozone Chain sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | OZO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
Ozone Chain
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Shuffle typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on Shuffle may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Shuffle has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Shuffle
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around SHFL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Ozone Chain
- Ozone Chain can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for Ozone Chain still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus Shuffle with Ozone Chain can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Ozone Chain
- Higher volatility on OZO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on Ozone Chain often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Shuffle can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Shuffle, while short-term performance leans toward Ozone Chain. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Shuffle holds market-cap $127.00M and rank #216; Ozone Chain shows $125.30M and #220. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Shuffle. Where durability matters, watch Shuffle. AI composite scores (57.80/57.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or Ozone Chain?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while Ozone Chain leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or OZO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and Ozone Chain.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Shuffle currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Ozone Chain, but longer windows can disagree.