Overview
From a portfolio lens, Litecoin ($3.72B) and ULTIMA ($210.19M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LTC | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $44.69 | $1,853.59 |
| Market Cap | $3.72B | $210.19M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $6.44M | $2.48M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 27.00 | 154.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.43% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LTC | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.13% | +2.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LTC | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 41.64 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 1.51 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 16.63 | 21.33 |
| Support | 43.03 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 46.04 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Litecoin shows RSI 41.64 with trend bias neutral, while ULTIMA sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LTC | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 1.00 | — |
| Github activity | 4,266.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Litecoin
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of Litecoin
- Litecoin has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for Litecoin can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Litecoin typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Litecoin can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Litecoin
- When dominance narratives fade, Litecoin can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for Litecoin can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of ULTIMA
- Narrative optionality around ULTIMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Litecoin with ULTIMA can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, ULTIMA may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ULTIMA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus Litecoin can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on ULTIMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Litecoin, while short-term performance leans toward ULTIMA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Litecoin at $44.69 and ULTIMA at $1,853.59. Relative performance over 24h (ULTIMA) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Litecoin or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Litecoin leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LTC or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Litecoin and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Litecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.