Overview
This page compares The Graph and Kamino with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#189 vs #266) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GRT | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.014382 | $0.017984 |
| Market Cap | $155.33M | $93.63M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.87M | $2.29M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 189.00 | 266.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GRT | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.70% | -1.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GRT | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for GRT/KMNO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GRT | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
The Graph
Kamino
Pros and cons
Pros of The Graph
- Composite PEPS readings for The Graph can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- GRT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for The Graph can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of The Graph
- When dominance narratives fade, The Graph can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit The Graph harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Kamino
- Narrative optionality around Kamino can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for Kamino still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Kamino
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Kamino more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Kamino.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for The Graph on size and The Graph on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: The Graph (GRT) trades near $0.014382 with a +0.70% day move, while Kamino (KMNO) is around $0.017984 (-1.60%). Volume leadership currently sits with The Graph, and market-cap leadership with The Graph. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, The Graph or Kamino?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. The Graph leads on market cap today, while The Graph leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GRT or KMNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both The Graph and Kamino.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. The Graph currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is The Graph, but longer windows can disagree.