Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Shuffle vs Kamino” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.298368 | $0.018106 |
| Market Cap | $126.77M | $94.19M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $512,972.00 | $1.99M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 217.00 | 265.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.80% | -1.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for SHFL/KMNO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | KMNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
Kamino
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Shuffle has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for Shuffle can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Shuffle typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Shuffle
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Shuffle harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for Shuffle can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Kamino
- Diversifying versus Shuffle with Kamino can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around Kamino can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for Kamino still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Kamino
- Trend failures on Kamino often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Kamino more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Shuffle on size and Kamino on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Shuffle holds market-cap $126.77M and rank #217; Kamino shows $94.19M and #265. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Kamino. Where durability matters, watch Shuffle. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or Kamino?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while Shuffle leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or KMNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and Kamino.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Kamino currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Shuffle, but longer windows can disagree.