Overview
Investors searching JST vs GNO usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. JST prints $0.106500 (+2.33%) while GNO is at $105.08 (+1.59%), with volume edge currently on JST.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.106500 | $105.08 |
| Market Cap | $871.60M | $277.08M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.54M | $86,545.77 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 73.00 | 130.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.33% | +1.59% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JST shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while GNO sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
GNO
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- Composite PEPS readings for JST can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for JST can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- JST often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of JST
- Large-cap status for JST can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around JST sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of GNO
- Diversifying versus JST with GNO can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around GNO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- GNO can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of GNO
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GNO.
- Trend failures on GNO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus JST can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JST, while short-term performance leans toward JST. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: JST (JST) trades near $0.106500 with a +2.33% day move, while GNO (GNO) is around $105.08 (+1.59%). Volume leadership currently sits with JST, and market-cap leadership with JST. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or GNO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while JST leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and GNO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JST currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JST, but longer windows can disagree.