Overview
This page compares JST and Cosmos Hub with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#74 vs #85) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.105800 | $1.26 |
| Market Cap | $865.17M | $723.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.55M | $1.48M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 74.00 | 85.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +4.22% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.10% | +1.45% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 18.97 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.05 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 51.19 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1.61 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for JST/ATOM currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 1,299.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
Cosmos Hub
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- Composite PEPS readings for JST can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for JST can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- JST often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of JST
- When dominance narratives fade, JST can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for JST can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around JST sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Narrative optionality around Cosmos Hub can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, Cosmos Hub may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus JST with Cosmos Hub can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Cosmos Hub.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Cosmos Hub more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on ATOM cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for JST on size and JST on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: JST (JST) trades near $0.105800 with a +2.10% day move, while Cosmos Hub (ATOM) is around $1.26 (+1.45%). Volume leadership currently sits with JST, and market-cap leadership with JST. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/18.97. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or Cosmos Hub?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while JST leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or ATOM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and Cosmos Hub.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JST currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JST, but longer windows can disagree.