Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means JUP and GRT are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.196900 | $0.014350 |
| Market Cap | $652.48M | $154.55M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.49M | $457,213.18 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 86.00 | 192.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.98% | -0.62% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for JUP/GRT currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
GRT
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- JUP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- JUP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on JUP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of JUP
- Indicator stacks on JUP may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JUP harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of GRT
- GRT can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on GRT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for GRT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of GRT
- Relative underperformance versus JUP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave GRT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for JUP on size and JUP on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put JUP at $0.196900 and GRT at $0.014350. Relative performance over 24h (JUP) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or GRT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while JUP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or GRT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and GRT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JUP, but longer windows can disagree.