Overview
Whether you arrived from a “GRAM vs IMX” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GRAM | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.43 | $0.112400 |
| Market Cap | $3.89B | $224.35M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.63M | $353,848.56 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 25.00 | 264.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GRAM | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.44% | +3.21% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GRAM | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for GRAM/IMX currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GRAM | IMX |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GRAM
IMX
Pros and cons
Pros of GRAM
- Composite PEPS readings for GRAM can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on GRAM may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- GRAM has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of GRAM
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GRAM harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for GRAM can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of IMX
- Active volume bursts on IMX sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus GRAM with IMX can change portfolio factor exposure.
- IMX can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around IMX can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of IMX
- Trend failures on IMX often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on IMX cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave IMX more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for GRAM on size and GRAM on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing GRAM and IMX begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1.43 versus $0.112400. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate IMX-vs-GRAM pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, GRAM or IMX?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GRAM leads on market cap today, while IMX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GRAM or IMX?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GRAM and IMX.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GRAM currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is IMX, but longer windows can disagree.