Overview
Investors searching HBAR vs WLD usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. HBAR prints $0.070040 (+0.33%) while WLD is at $0.315900 (+2.80%), with volume edge currently on WLD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HBAR | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.070040 | $0.315900 |
| Market Cap | $3.07B | $1.13B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3.50M | $10.10M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 29.00 | 62.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HBAR | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.33% | +2.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HBAR | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.80 vs 57.80) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HBAR | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HBAR
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of HBAR
- Composite PEPS readings for HBAR can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- HBAR has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- HBAR typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of HBAR
- Large-cap status for HBAR can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on HBAR may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, HBAR can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of WLD
- Diversifying versus HBAR with WLD can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around WLD can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for WLD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of WLD
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for WLD.
- Higher volatility on WLD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, HBAR looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, WLD is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: HBAR (HBAR) trades near $0.070040 with a +0.33% day move, while WLD (WLD) is around $0.315900 (+2.80%). Volume leadership currently sits with WLD, and market-cap leadership with HBAR. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, HBAR or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HBAR leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HBAR or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HBAR and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.