Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means USDE and HASH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $3.87B | $441.51M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.48M | $2,881.54 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 25.00 | 105.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.05% | -9.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for USDE/HASH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDE | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDE
HASH
Pros and cons
Pros of USDE
- Market-cap scale on USDE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- USDE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for USDE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of USDE
- Crowded positioning around USDE sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for USDE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of HASH
- PEPS tracking for HASH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- HASH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around HASH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, HASH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of HASH
- Relative underperformance versus USDE can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on HASH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for HASH.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for USDE on size and USDE on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put USDE at $1.00 and HASH at $1,856.75. Relative performance over 24h (USDE) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, USDE or HASH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDE leads on market cap today, while USDE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDE or HASH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDE and HASH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is USDE, but longer windows can disagree.