Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Provenance Blockchain and dogwifhat are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | WIF |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007891 | $0.141084 |
| Market Cap | $442.02M | $140.93M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1,940.52 | $24.70M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 205.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | WIF |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.70% | +1.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | WIF |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | WIF |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Provenance Blockchain
dogwifhat
Pros and cons
Pros of Provenance Blockchain
- Higher ranking for Provenance Blockchain can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for Provenance Blockchain can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Provenance Blockchain
- Large-cap status for Provenance Blockchain can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Provenance Blockchain can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of dogwifhat
- Narrative optionality around dogwifhat can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on WIF sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- dogwifhat can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of dogwifhat
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave dogwifhat more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on WIF cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for dogwifhat.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Provenance Blockchain) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (dogwifhat) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
Comparing HASH and WIF begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.007891 versus $0.141084. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate WIF-vs-HASH pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Provenance Blockchain or dogwifhat?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Provenance Blockchain leads on market cap today, while dogwifhat leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or WIF?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Provenance Blockchain and dogwifhat.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. dogwifhat currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is dogwifhat, but longer windows can disagree.