Overview
Whether you arrived from a “GUSD vs NEO” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $1.83 |
| Market Cap | $149.64M | $128.55M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $798,498.00 | $128,286.29 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 196.00 | 215.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | -0.06% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across GUSD and NEO, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GUSD | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GUSD
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of GUSD
- Market-cap scale on GUSD may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- GUSD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for GUSD can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of GUSD
- Crowded positioning around GUSD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, GUSD can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of NEO
- If technical momentum aligns, NEO may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus GUSD with NEO can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for NEO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of NEO
- Relative underperformance versus GUSD can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on NEO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on NEO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. GUSD and NEO can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing GUSD and NEO begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,861.70 versus $1.83. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate NEO-vs-GUSD pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, GUSD or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GUSD leads on market cap today, while GUSD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GUSD or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GUSD and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. GUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GUSD, but longer windows can disagree.