Overview
GNO vs SHFL is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.16 | $1,867.53 |
| Market Cap | $274.90M | $127.00M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $99,497.98 | $509,158.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 216.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.55% | -0.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across GNO and SHFL, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
SHFL
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- GNO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- GNO has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- GNO typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of GNO
- Crowded positioning around GNO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on GNO may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GNO harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of SHFL
- SHFL can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around SHFL can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, SHFL may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of SHFL
- Relative underperformance versus GNO can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on SHFL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on SHFL often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. GNO and SHFL can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. GNO holds market-cap $274.90M and rank #129; SHFL shows $127.00M and #216. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch SHFL. Where durability matters, watch GNO. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or SHFL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while SHFL leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and SHFL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SHFL currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is SHFL, but longer windows can disagree.