Overview
Whether you arrived from a “GNO vs NEO” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.16 | $1.83 |
| Market Cap | $274.90M | $128.71M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $99,497.98 | $123,728.51 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 215.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.55% | +0.49% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for GNO/NEO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- GNO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on GNO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for GNO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of GNO
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, GNO can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of NEO
- NEO can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for NEO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on NEO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, NEO may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of NEO
- Relative underperformance versus GNO can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on NEO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for NEO.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for GNO on size and NEO on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. GNO and NEO solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while NEO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. NEO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is NEO, but longer windows can disagree.