Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means First Digital USD and Gnosis are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FDUSD | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.997270 | $104.13 |
| Market Cap | $349.21M | $274.90M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $60.26M | $769,004.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 116.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FDUSD | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | -1.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FDUSD | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FDUSD | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
First Digital USD
Gnosis
Pros and cons
Pros of First Digital USD
- First Digital USD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for First Digital USD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- First Digital USD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for First Digital USD can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of First Digital USD
- Large-cap status for First Digital USD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around FDUSD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, First Digital USD can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Gnosis
- Narrative optionality around Gnosis can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus First Digital USD with Gnosis can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Gnosis may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on GNO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Gnosis
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Gnosis more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus First Digital USD can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Gnosis often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (First Digital USD) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (First Digital USD) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: First Digital USD (FDUSD) trades near $0.997270 with a +0.00% day move, while Gnosis (GNO) is around $104.13 (-1.00%). Volume leadership currently sits with First Digital USD, and market-cap leadership with First Digital USD. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, First Digital USD or Gnosis?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. First Digital USD leads on market cap today, while First Digital USD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FDUSD or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both First Digital USD and Gnosis.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. First Digital USD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is First Digital USD, but longer windows can disagree.