Overview
Chainlink (LINK) and GNO (GNO) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($8.40 vs $105.93), market leadership still favors Chainlink on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Chainlink.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.40 | $105.93 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $278.88M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.93M | $79,300.95 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 130.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.06% | +2.92% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight neutral conditions on LINK and bearish on GNO. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
GNO
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Chainlink can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Chainlink
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, Chainlink can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on Chainlink may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of GNO
- If technical momentum aligns, GNO may outperform on medium-term windows.
- GNO can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on GNO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of GNO
- Higher volatility on GNO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus Chainlink can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GNO.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Chainlink at $8.40 and GNO at $105.93. Relative performance over 24h (Chainlink) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or GNO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and GNO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.