Overview
Investors searching GNO vs ATH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. GNO prints $104.86 (+1.75%) while ATH is at $1,880.40 (-0.80%), with volume edge currently on ATH.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.86 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $276.73M | $77.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $77,613.35 | $4.87M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 130.00 | 295.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.75% | -0.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on GNO and bearish on ATH. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- GNO has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for GNO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on GNO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of GNO
- When dominance narratives fade, GNO can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GNO harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around GNO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for GNO can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of ATH
- Active volume bursts on ATH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus GNO with ATH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, ATH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of ATH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ATH.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
Comparing GNO and ATH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $104.86 versus $1,880.40. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate ATH-vs-GNO pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while GNO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GNO, but longer windows can disagree.