Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Worldcoin vs Flare” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.316539 | $0.006290 |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $545.89M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $107.46M | $1.57M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 61.00 | 94.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.50% | +0.60% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Worldcoin and Flare, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Worldcoin
Flare
Pros and cons
Pros of Worldcoin
- Worldcoin has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Worldcoin typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for Worldcoin can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Worldcoin
- When dominance narratives fade, Worldcoin can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for Worldcoin can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around WLD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Flare
- Narrative optionality around Flare can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on FLR sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Flare can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Flare
- Trend failures on Flare often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Flare more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on FLR cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Worldcoin and Flare can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Worldcoin holds market-cap $1.13B and rank #61; Flare shows $545.89M and #94. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Worldcoin. Where durability matters, watch Worldcoin. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Worldcoin or Flare?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Worldcoin leads on market cap today, while Worldcoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or FLR?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Worldcoin and Flare.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Worldcoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Worldcoin, but longer windows can disagree.